The Structure of the Theoretical Power of Judgment. Kant and the Value of Our Empirical Cognitions
Identifieur interne : 000020 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000019; suivant : 000021The Structure of the Theoretical Power of Judgment. Kant and the Value of Our Empirical Cognitions
Auteurs : Benjamin Trémoulet [France]Source :
- Kant-Studien [ 0022-8877 ] ; 2011-04.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Absolute certainty, Actual knowledge, Cambridge edition, Cognition, Cognitive status, Cognitive value, Constitutive, Constitutive judgment, Constitutive principles, Contingent, Contingent constitution, Critique, Derivative empirica, Determinative, Different levels, Dynamical principles, Eeku, Einen, Empirical, Empirical applications, Empirical certainty, Empirical cognitions, Empirical concepts, Empirical determination, Empirical experience, Empirical intuitions, Empirical judgments, Empirical knowledge, Empirical truth, English translations, First critique, First introduction, General principle, Greater detail, Important role, Inner relation, Kant, Kants kritik, Logical principles, Mathematical principles, Metaphysical foundations, Metaphysical principles, Methodological hypothesis, Natural science, Natural sciences, Necessary constitution, Objective principle, Objective purposiveness, Objective truth, Objective validity, Originarie empirica, Other ones, Other words, Particular constitution, Particular laws, Paul guyer, Philosophie critique, Physical laws, Precise definition, Prima facie, Pure reason, Pure understanding, Purposiveness, Reflective judgment, Reflective judgments, Regulative, Regulative principle, Regulative principles, Same status, Same time, Subjective purposiveness, Systematic unity, Systematische einheit, Teleological power, Theoretical philosophy, Theoretical power, Third critique, Third critiques, Third section, Thoroughgoing determination, Transcendental, Transcendental determination, Transcendental dialectic, Transcendental ideas, Transcendental ones, Transcendental philosophy, Transcendental power, Transcendental principles, Transcendental reflection, Urteilskraft, Vier studien.
Abstract
This paper argues that the cognitive status and cognitive value of thoughts should be clarified through a description of the mechanics of the theoretical power of judgment. Three pairs of concepts essentially constitute its tools: 1. determinative and reflective judgments; 2. constitutive and regulative principles; and 3. transcendental and empirical applications. Against the general approach to dealing with these concepts, i.e., against the tendency to consider them as synonymous or as forming a parallel structure, this article sharpens the distinctions between these three pairs of concepts. For that reason the methodological hypothesis according to which there is no inner relation between these respective pairs of concepts will be put to the test. The hypothesis says that these concepts should be prima facie combinable: e. g., one should be able to say what a judgment that is simultaneously transcendental, regulative and determining would be like, or why such a combination is impossible. Combining the three concept-pairs creates eight possibilities that are presented systematically in the table at the end of the article. The discussion shows the precise status of each kind of law of nature and their relationships to empirical experience are described in greater detail.
Url:
DOI: 10.1515/kant.2011.003
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Structure of the Theoretical Power of Judgment. Kant and the Value of Our Empirical Cognitions</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Tremoulet, Benjamin" sort="Tremoulet, Benjamin" uniqKey="Tremoulet B" first="Benjamin" last="Trémoulet">Benjamin Trémoulet</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F3A0E14A50131476E39C6C7857CD2754FCC55433</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1515/kant.2011.003</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F3A0E14A50131476E39C6C7857CD2754FCC55433/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000730</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000730</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000719</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000020</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Exploration">000020</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The Structure of the Theoretical Power of Judgment. Kant and the Value of Our Empirical Cognitions</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Tremoulet, Benjamin" sort="Tremoulet, Benjamin" uniqKey="Tremoulet B" first="Benjamin" last="Trémoulet">Benjamin Trémoulet</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country>France</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Paris</settlement><region type="région" nuts="2">Île-de-France</region></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Kant-Studien</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Kant-Studien</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-8877</idno><idno type="eISSN">1613-1134</idno><imprint><publisher>Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG</publisher><date type="published" when="2011-04">2011-04</date><biblScope unit="volume">102</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="46">46</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="68">68</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-8877</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-8877</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Absolute certainty</term><term>Actual knowledge</term><term>Cambridge edition</term><term>Cognition</term><term>Cognitive status</term><term>Cognitive value</term><term>Constitutive</term><term>Constitutive judgment</term><term>Constitutive principles</term><term>Contingent</term><term>Contingent constitution</term><term>Critique</term><term>Derivative empirica</term><term>Determinative</term><term>Different levels</term><term>Dynamical principles</term><term>Eeku</term><term>Einen</term><term>Empirical</term><term>Empirical applications</term><term>Empirical certainty</term><term>Empirical cognitions</term><term>Empirical concepts</term><term>Empirical determination</term><term>Empirical experience</term><term>Empirical intuitions</term><term>Empirical judgments</term><term>Empirical knowledge</term><term>Empirical truth</term><term>English translations</term><term>First critique</term><term>First introduction</term><term>General principle</term><term>Greater detail</term><term>Important role</term><term>Inner relation</term><term>Kant</term><term>Kants kritik</term><term>Logical principles</term><term>Mathematical principles</term><term>Metaphysical foundations</term><term>Metaphysical principles</term><term>Methodological hypothesis</term><term>Natural science</term><term>Natural sciences</term><term>Necessary constitution</term><term>Objective principle</term><term>Objective purposiveness</term><term>Objective truth</term><term>Objective validity</term><term>Originarie empirica</term><term>Other ones</term><term>Other words</term><term>Particular constitution</term><term>Particular laws</term><term>Paul guyer</term><term>Philosophie critique</term><term>Physical laws</term><term>Precise definition</term><term>Prima facie</term><term>Pure reason</term><term>Pure understanding</term><term>Purposiveness</term><term>Reflective judgment</term><term>Reflective judgments</term><term>Regulative</term><term>Regulative principle</term><term>Regulative principles</term><term>Same status</term><term>Same time</term><term>Subjective purposiveness</term><term>Systematic unity</term><term>Systematische einheit</term><term>Teleological power</term><term>Theoretical philosophy</term><term>Theoretical power</term><term>Third critique</term><term>Third critiques</term><term>Third section</term><term>Thoroughgoing determination</term><term>Transcendental</term><term>Transcendental determination</term><term>Transcendental dialectic</term><term>Transcendental ideas</term><term>Transcendental ones</term><term>Transcendental philosophy</term><term>Transcendental power</term><term>Transcendental principles</term><term>Transcendental reflection</term><term>Urteilskraft</term><term>Vier studien</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This paper argues that the cognitive status and cognitive value of thoughts should be clarified through a description of the mechanics of the theoretical power of judgment. Three pairs of concepts essentially constitute its tools: 1. determinative and reflective judgments; 2. constitutive and regulative principles; and 3. transcendental and empirical applications. Against the general approach to dealing with these concepts, i.e., against the tendency to consider them as synonymous or as forming a parallel structure, this article sharpens the distinctions between these three pairs of concepts. For that reason the methodological hypothesis according to which there is no inner relation between these respective pairs of concepts will be put to the test. The hypothesis says that these concepts should be prima facie combinable: e. g., one should be able to say what a judgment that is simultaneously transcendental, regulative and determining would be like, or why such a combination is impossible. Combining the three concept-pairs creates eight possibilities that are presented systematically in the table at the end of the article. The discussion shows the precise status of each kind of law of nature and their relationships to empirical experience are described in greater detail.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>France</li></country><region><li>Île-de-France</li></region><settlement><li>Paris</li></settlement></list><tree><country name="France"><region name="Île-de-France"><name sortKey="Tremoulet, Benjamin" sort="Tremoulet, Benjamin" uniqKey="Tremoulet B" first="Benjamin" last="Trémoulet">Benjamin Trémoulet</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/DiesIraeV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000020 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000020 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= DiesIraeV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:F3A0E14A50131476E39C6C7857CD2754FCC55433
|texte= The Structure of the Theoretical Power of Judgment. Kant and the Value of Our Empirical Cognitions
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |